Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 7 Oct 2021

Fu Chuanke, Ostersen Tage, Christensen Ole F, Xiang Tao

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (SSGBLUP) method is a popular approach for genetic evaluation with high-density genotype data. To solve the problem that pedigree and genomic relationship matrices refer to different base populations, a single-step genomic method with metafounders (MF-SSGBLUP) was put forward. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive ability and bias...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Denmark
Share to Genome
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Phenotype

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 34620083
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00670-x
PMCID: PMC8499570

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.PMID 34620083Read ↗

Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.