Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 May 2023

Jibrila Ibrahim, Ten Napel Jan, Vandenplas Jeremie, Bergsma Rob, Veerkamp Roel F, Calus Mario P L

Abstract excerpt

We have previously shown that single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) estimates breeding values of genomically preselected animals without preselection bias for widely recorded traits, that is traits recorded for the majority of animals in the breeding population. This study investigated the impact of genomic preselection (GPS) on accuracy and bias in ssGBLUP evaluation of genomically...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Eating
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Share to Phenotype

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36637041
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12754

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.PMID 36637041Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-trait genomic prediction in pigs using single and multistep methods based on the absorption of ungenotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.