Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG - 1 Jul 2021

Mascalzoni Deborah, Biasiotto Roberta, Borsche Max, Brüggemann Norbert, De Grandi Alessandro, Goegele Martin, Frygner-Holm Sara, Klein Christine, Kösters Maria, Staunton Ciara, Pramstaller Peter P, Krawczak Michael, Hicks Andrew A

Abstract excerpt

Recall by genotype (RbG) studies aim to better understand the phenotypes that correspond to genetic variants of interest, by recruiting carriers of such variants for further phenotyping. RbG approaches pose major ethical and legal challenges related to the disclosure of possibly unwanted genetic information. The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study is a longitudinal cohort study based in South...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Disclosure
Share to Genetic Association Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Informed Consent

Share to Patient Selection

Share to Pilot Projects

Share to Research Design

Share to Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33981014
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7
PMCID: PMC8298596

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.PMID 33981014Read ↗

Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-Driven Recruitment and the Disclosure of Individual Research Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of research results in genetic studies of Parkinson's disease caused by LRRK2 mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Psychiatric Genetics Research: Perceptions of Best Practices in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics ResearchersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documentsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.