Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Oct 2020

Tsai Ginger J, Chen Annie T, Garrett Lauren T, Burke Wylie, Bowen Deborah J, Shirts Brian H

Abstract excerpt

Effective communication of genetic information within families depends on several factors. Few studies explore intra-familial communication of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results or active collaboration between family members to classify VUS. Our qualitative study aimed to describe the experiences of individuals asked by family members to participate in the FindMyVariant study, a patient-driven family...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Communication
Share to Family

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Motivation

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Perception

Share to Qualitative Research

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 31916645
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1215
PMCID: PMC7343600

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Exploring relatives' perceptions of participation, ethics, and communication in a patient-driven study for hereditary cancer variant reclassification.PMID 31916645Read ↗

Assessing patient communication preferences for reclassified variants of uncertain significance in a general genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant ReclassificationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

What do cancer genetic providers want us to know about variant reclassification and recontact that we are not asking? A thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: The emerging issue of incidental findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public perspectives on healthcare professional-directed communication of hereditary genetic risks: a mixed-method systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Most people share genetic test results with relatives even if the findings are normal: Family communication in a diverse population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Am I My Family's Keeper? Disclosure Dilemmas in Next-Generation SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.