Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG - 1 Sept 2022

Tschigg Katharina, Consoli Luca, Biasiotto Roberta, Mascalzoni Deborah

Abstract excerpt

Recall by Genotype (RbG), Genotype-driven-recall (GDR), and Genotype-based-recall (GBR) strategies are increasingly used to conduct genomic or biobanking sub-studies that single out participants as eligible because of their specific individual genotypic information. However, existing regulatory and governance frameworks do not apply to all aspects of genotype-driven research approaches. The recall strategies...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biological Specimen Banks
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35705790
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y
PMCID: PMC9437022

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.PMID 35705790Read ↗

Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-Driven Recruitment and the Disclosure of Individual Research Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing results to genomic research participants: differences that matter.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Engaging Adolescents and Young Adults in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results: a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocolSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic/Genomic Testing: Defining The Parameters For Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of results from genomic research: a practical toolSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.