Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2018

Minion Joel T, Butcher Frances, Timpson Nicholas, Murtagh Madeleine J

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: Recall by genotype (RbG) research recruits on the basis of genetic variation. Increased use of this approach presents an ethical conundrum for cohort studies/biobanks: whether to inform individuals of their genetic information and deviate from standard practice of non-disclosure of results, or mask this information at the level of the individual participant. This paper examines the perspectives of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Research
Share to Genetic Testing
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Informed Consent

Share to Longitudinal Studies

Share to Young Adult

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 30114272
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202502
PMCID: PMC6095592

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.PMID 30114272Read ↗

Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Risks, Benefits, Solidarity: A Framework for the Participation of Children in Genetic Biobank ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-Driven Recruitment and the Disclosure of Individual Research Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical issues in medical-sequencing research: implications of genotype-phenotype studies for individuals and populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: The emerging issue of incidental findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent, and an ethico-legal framework for paediatric observational research and biobanking: the experience of an Italian birth cohort study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.