Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE - 1 Dec 2011

Beskow Laura M, Namey Emily E, Cadigan R Jean, Brazg Tracy, Crouch Julia, Henderson Gail E, Michie Marsha, Nelson Daniel K, Tabor Holly K, Wilfond Benjamin S

Abstract excerpt

Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Attitude

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Disclosure

Share to Genetic Research

Share to Genotype

Share to Interviews as Topic

Share to Patient Selection

Share to Young Adult

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22228056
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3
PMCID: PMC3395316

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.PMID 22228056Read ↗

Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype-Driven Recruitment and the Disclosure of Individual Research Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.