Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Rapture-ready darters: Choice of reference genome and genotyping method (whole-genome or sequence capture) influence population genomic inference in Etheostoma.

Molecular ecology resources - 1 Feb 2021

Reid Brendan N, Moran Rachel L, Kopack Christopher J, Fitzpatrick Sarah W

Abstract excerpt

Researchers studying nonmodel organisms have an increasing number of methods available for generating genomic data. However, the applicability of different methods across species, as well as the effect of reference genome choice on population genomic inference, remain difficult to predict in many cases. We evaluated the impact of data type (whole-genome vs. reduced representation) and reference genome choice on...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetics, Population
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Metagenomics

Share to Perciformes

Share to Phylogeny

Share to Sequence Analysis, DNA

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33058399
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13275

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Rapture-ready darters: Choice of reference genome and genotyping method (whole-genome or sequence capture) influence population genomic inference in Etheostoma.PMID 33058399Read ↗

Whole-genome sequencing approaches for conservation biology: Advantages, limitations and practical recommendations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

When technology meets conservation: increased microsatellite marker production using 454 genome sequencing on the endangered Okaloosa Darter (Etheostoma okaloosae).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Going where traditional markers have not gone before: utility of and promise for RAD sequencing in marine invertebrate phylogeography and population genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

De Novo Genome Assemblies of Four Rainbow Trout Genetic Lines Reveal Structural Variants in Pursuit of a Pangenome Reference.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Amplification biases and consistent recovery of loci in a double-digest RAD-seq protocol.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A resource of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms generated by RAD tag sequencing in the critically endangered European eel.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide SNPs redefines species boundaries and conservation units in the freshwater mussel genus Cyprogenia of North America.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nucleotide and structural polymorphisms of the eastern oyster genome paint a mosaic of divergence, selection, and human impactsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Next-generation phylogeography: a targeted approach for multilocus sequencing of non-model organisms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Leveraging synteny to generate reference genomes for conservation: Assembling the genomes of Hector’s and Māui dolphinsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A genome-structure adaptive framework for ROH-based inbreeding estimation in Penaeus vannamei.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.