Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

How good are comparative models in the understanding of protein dynamics?

Proteins - 1 Jul 2020

Yazhini Arangasamy, Srinivasan Narayanaswamy

Abstract excerpt

The 3D structure of a protein is essential to understand protein dynamics. If experimentally determined structure is unavailable, comparative models could be used to infer dynamics. However, the effectiveness of comparative models, compared to experimental structures, in inferring dynamics is not clear. To address this, we compared dynamics features of ~800 comparative models with their crystal structures using...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Share to Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical
Share to Protein Conformation, beta-Strand

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs

Share to Ribonuclease, Pancreatic

Share to Ribonucleases

Share to Structural Homology, Protein

Share to Thermodynamics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31999374
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25879

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How good are comparative models in the understanding of protein dynamics?PMID 31999374Read ↗

ATOMDANCE: kernel-based denoising and allosteric resonance analysis for functional and evolutionary comparisons of protein dynamicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Collective dynamics differentiates functional divergence in protein evolution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of AlphaFold and molecular dynamics structure predictions of mutations in serpins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accurate protein stability predictions from homology modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diversity and motif conservation in protein 3D structural landscape: exploration by a new multivariate simulation method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of AlphaFold and molecular dynamics structure predictions of mutations in serpinsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid Characterization of Allosteric Networks with Ensemble Normal Mode Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Computational Insights into the Structural Dynamics of MDA5 Variants Associated with Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome and Singleton-Merten Syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Long-timescale atomistic simulations uncover loss-of-function mechanisms of uncharacterized Angiogenin mutants associated with ALS.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple Gaussian network modes alignment reveals dynamically variable regions: the hemoglobin case.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.