Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Mapping depression rating scale phenotypes onto research domain criteria (RDoC) to inform biological research in mood disorders.

Journal of affective disorders - 1 Oct 2018

Ahmed Ahmed T, Frye Mark A, Rush A John, Biernacka Joanna M, Craighead W Edward, McDonald William M, Bobo William V, Riva-Posse Patricio, Tye Susannah J, Mayberg Helen S, Hall-Flavin Daniel K, Skime Michelle K, Jenkins Greg D, Wang Liewei, Krishnan Ranga Rama, Weinshilboum Richard M, Kaddurah-Daouk Rima, Dunlop Boadie W

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Substantial research progress can be achieved if available clinical datasets can be mapped to the National Institute of Mental Health Research-Domain-Criteria (RDoC) constructs. This mapping would allow investigators to both explore more narrowly defined clinical phenotypes and the relationship of these phenotypes to biological markers and clinical outcomes approximating RDoC criteria. METHODS: Using...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Depressive Disorder, Major

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mental Health Research Topics

Share to Mood Disorders

Share to Phenotype

Share to Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

Share to Research Design

Share to Treatment of Major Depression

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29807322
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.005
PMCID: PMC6374030

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Mapping depression rating scale phenotypes onto research domain criteria (RDoC) to inform biological research in mood disorders.PMID 29807322Read ↗

Genetic factors and symptom dimensions associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes: clues for new potential therapeutic targets?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotype Risk Scores: moving beyond ‘cases’ and ‘controls’ to classify psychiatric disease in hospital-based biobanksSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining Major Depressive Disorder Cohorts Using the EHR: Multiple Phenotypes Based on ICD-9 Codes and Medication OrdersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Intermediate phenotypes and biomarkers of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dissection of the clinical phenome of major depressive disorder into subdomains and subgroups in relation to activated immune-inflammatory profilesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Symptom dimensions of major depression in a large community-based cohort.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotype-by-phenome-wide association study of treatment resistant depressionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Association of clinical phenotypes of depression with comorbid conditions, treatment patterns and outcomes: a 10-year region-based cohort study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Thyroid dysfunction and Research Domain Criteria framework-based depression phenotypes: Insights from a historical longitudinal cohort.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mapping heterogeneity in the neuroanatomical correlates of depressionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the genetic heterogeneity in major depression across diagnostic criteria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring depression treatment response by using polygenic risk scoring across diverse populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.