Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models.

BMC medical genomics - 19 Jan 2016

Potenciano Víctor, Abad-Grau María Mar, Alcina Antonio, Matesanz Fuencisla

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Various approaches are being used to predict individual risk to polygenic diseases from data provided by genome-wide association studies. As there are substantial differences between the diseases investigated, the data sets used and the way they are tested, it is difficult to assess which models are more suitable for this task. RESULTS: We compared different approaches for seven complex diseases...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Area Under Curve
Share to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Share to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome, Human

Share to Haplotypes

Share to Logistic Models

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 26782991
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-015-0157-2
PMCID: PMC4717655

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models.PMID 26782991Read ↗

Machine learning methods applied to classify complex diseases using genomic dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Improved Type 2 Diabetes Risk Stratification in the Qatar Biobank Cohort by Ensemble Learning Classifier Incorporating Multi-Trait, Population-Specific, Polygenic Risk ScoresSemantic proximity Read ↗

Harnessing the information contained within genome-wide association studies to improve individual prediction of complex disease risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of Complex Disease RiskSemantic proximity Read ↗

Improved prediction of complex diseases by common genetic markers: state of the art and further perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction of 16 Complex Disease Risks Including Heart Attack, Diabetes, Breast and Prostate Cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical and research uses of genetic risk scores in type 1 diabetes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A unifying framework for evaluating the predictive power of genetic variants based on the level of heritability explained.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the heritability explained by known susceptibility variants: a survey of ten complex diseases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hierarchical Naive Bayes for genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A fast boosting-based screening method for large-scale association study in complex traits with genetic heterogeneity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Practical issues in building risk-predicting models for complex diseases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.