Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.

Scientific reports - 9 Mar 2022

Mohammadpanah Mahshid, Ayatollahi Mehrgardi Ahmad, Gilbert Hélène, Larzul Catherine, Mercat Marie-José, Esmailizadeh Ali, Momen Mehdi, Tusell Llibertat

Abstract excerpt

The present research has estimated the additive and dominance genetic variances of genic and intergenic segments for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT) and pH of the semimembranosus dorsi muscle (PHS). Further, the predictive performance using additive and additive dominance models in a purebred Piétrain (PB) and a crossbred (Piétrain × Large White, CB) pig population was assessed. All genomic...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genome
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35264636
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3
PMCID: PMC8907311

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.PMID 35264636Read ↗

Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating additive and dominance variances for complex traits in pigs combining genomic and pedigree information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits using 50 K and imputed high-density SNP genotypes in Yunong-black pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Including dominance effects in the prediction model through locus-specific weights on heterozygous genotypes can greatly improve genomic predictive abilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits in commercial crossbred Piétrain pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.