Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 25 Nov 2016

Xiang Tao, Christensen Ole Fredslund, Vitezica Zulma Gladis, Legarra Andres

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Improved performance of crossbred animals is partly due to heterosis. One of the major genetic bases of heterosis is dominance, but it is seldom used in pedigree-based genetic evaluation of livestock. Recently, a trivariate genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model including dominance was developed, which can distinguish purebreds from crossbred animals explicitly. The objectives of this...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Crosses, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genes, Dominant

Share to Genomics

Share to Inbreeding Depression

Share to Inheritance Patterns

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sus scrofa

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 27887565
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0271-4
PMCID: PMC5123321

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.PMID 27887565Read ↗

Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in a single-step approach with metafounders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.