Prostate cancer segregation analyses using 4390 families from UK and Australian population-based studies.

doi:10.1002/gepi.20433

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Community

Back to search

Article

Prostate cancer segregation analyses using 4390 families from UK and Australian population-based studies.

Genetic epidemiology - 1 Jan 2010

MacInnis Robert J, Antoniou Antonis C, Eeles Rosalind A, Severi Gianluca, Guy Michelle, McGuffog Lesley, Hall Amanda L, O'Brien Lynne T, Wilkinson Rosemary A, Dearnaley David P, Ardern-Jones Audrey T, Horwich Alan, Khoo Vincent S, Parker Christopher C, Huddart Robert A, McCredie Margaret R, Smith Charmaine, Southey Melissa C, Staples Margaret P, English Dallas R, Hopper John L, Giles Graham G, Easton Douglas F

Abstract excerpt

Familial aggregation of prostate cancer is likely to be due to multiple susceptibility loci, perhaps acting in conjunction with shared lifestyle risk factors. Models that assume a single mode of inheritance may be unrealistic. We analyzed genetic models of susceptibility to prostate cancer using segregation analysis of occurrence in families ascertained through population-based series totaling 4390 incident...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adult Children

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Australia

Share to Fathers

Share to Genes, Recessive

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Prostatic Neoplasms

Share to Siblings

Share to United Kingdom

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 19492347
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20433

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Prostate cancer segregation analyses using 4390 families from UK and Australian population-based studies.PMID 19492347Read ↗

Segregation analyses of 1,476 population-based Australian families affected by prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A risk prediction algorithm based on family history and common genetic variants: application to prostate cancer with potential clinical impact.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in France: evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance and residual brother-brother dependence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mendelian inheritance of familial prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance of prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Segregation analysis of 1,546 prostate cancer families in Finland shows recessive inheritance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in 1719 white, African-American and Asian-American families in the United States and CanadaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in Sweden: support for dominant inheritance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An epidemiological reappraisal of the familial aggregation of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Risk Model for Prostate Cancer Using Environmental and Genetic Factors in the Spanish Multi-Case-Control (MCC) Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inherited predisposition to prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Results of a genome-wide linkage analysis in prostate cancer families ascertained through the ACTANE consortium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.