Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

An empirical comparison of meta-analyses of published gene-disease associations versus consortium analyses.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics - 1 Mar 2009

Janssens A Cecile J W, González-Zuloeta Ladd Angela M, López-Léon Sandra, Ioannidis John P A, Oostra Ben A, Khoury Muin J, van Duijn Cornelia M

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: Consortia of investigators currently compile sufficiently large sample sizes to investigate the effects of low-risk susceptibility genetic variants. It is not clear how the results obtained by consortia compare with those derived from meta-analyses of published studies. METHODS: We perfo...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breast Neoplasms
Share to Caspase 8
Share to Gene Frequency

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Odds Ratio

Share to Polymorphism, Genetic

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Risk Factors

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 19367188
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181929237

Genes

CASP8

Variants

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-19367188-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 9 closest

An empirical comparison of meta-analyses of published gene-disease associations versus consortium analyses.PMID 19367188Read ↗

Consortium analysis of 7 candidate SNPs for ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: evidence from meta-analyses, pooled analyses, and genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

CASP8 polymorphisms contribute to cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis of 23 publications with 55 individual studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A systematic analysis of the association studies between CASP8 D302H polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of two CASP8 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of the variants CASP8 D302H and CASP10 V410I with breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The CASP8 -652 6N del promoter polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a multicenter study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Five polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The CASP8 rs3834129 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.