Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Flexible design for following up positive findings.

American journal of human genetics - 1 Sept 2007

Yu Kai, Chatterjee Nilanjan, Wheeler William, Li Qizhai, Wang Sophia, Rothman Nathaniel, Wacholder Sholom

Abstract excerpt

As more population-based studies suggest associations between genetic variants and disease risk, there is a need to improve the design of follow-up studies (stage II) in independent samples to confirm evidence of association observed at the initial stage (stage I). We propose to use flexible desi...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Follow-Up Studies
Share to Genetic Linkage
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Share to Research Design

Share to Sample Size

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 17701899
DOI: 10.1086/520678
PMCID: PMC1950823

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-17701899-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Flexible design for following up positive findings.PMID 17701899Read ↗

Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A flexible genome-wide bootstrap method that accounts for ranking and threshold-selection bias in GWAS interpretation and replication study design.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A robust test for two-stage design in genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Study designs for genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Flexible designs for genomewide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bigger, better, sooner--scaling up for success.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a two-step iterative resampling procedure for internal validation of genome-wide association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Simulated sample splitting approach to address biases due to instrument selection and participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian Randomization studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Probability that a two-stage genome-wide association study will detect a disease-associated snp and implications for multistage designs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A GIFT to researchers with sample sizes too small for GWASSemantic proximity Read ↗

Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.