Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Donor cell differentiation, reprogramming, and cloning efficiency: Elusive or illusive correlation?

12 Oct 2006

Abstract excerpt

Compared to other assisted reproductive technologies, mammalian nuclear transfer (NT) cloning is inefficient in generating viable offspring. It has been postulated that nuclear reprogramming and cloning efficiency can be increased by choosing less differentiated cell types as nuclear donors. This hypothesis is mainly supported by comparative mouse cloning experiments using early blastomeres, embryonic stem (ES)...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Share to Renal and related cancers
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17039535
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20654

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Donor cell differentiation, reprogramming, and cloning efficiency: Elusive or illusive correlation?PMID 17039535Read ↗

Equivalency of Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Embryonic Stem Cells to Those Derived from Fertilized Mouse BlastocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Inefficient reprogramming of the hematopoietic stem cell genome following nuclear transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cloned mice and embryonic stem cell establishment from adult somatic cells.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nuclear transplantation: lessons from frogs and mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Donor Cells for Nuclear Cloning: Many Are Called, but Few Are ChosenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Mouse cloning with nucleus donor cells of different age and typeSemantic proximity Read ↗

How to Improve the Success Rate of Mouse Cloning TechnologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Mice Cloned by Nuclear Transfer from Somatic and ntES Cells Derived from the Same IndividualsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Climbing Mount Efficiency – Small Steps, Not Giant Leaps Towards Higher Cloning Success in Farm AnimalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Lessons Learned from Somatic Cell Nuclear TransferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient derivation and transcriptional characterization of mouse extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell lines generated by somatic cell nuclear transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reprogramming Efficiency Following Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Is Influenced by the Differentiation and Methylation State of the Donor NucleusSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.