Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A note on the power provided by sibships of sizes 2, 3, and 4 in genetic covariance modeling of a codominant QTL.

Behavior genetics - 1 May 1999

Dolan C V, Boomsma D I, Neale M C

Abstract excerpt

The contribution of size 3 and size 4 sibships to power in covariance structure modeling of a codominant QTL is investigated. Power calculations are based on the noncentral chi-square distribution. Sixteen sets of parameter values are considered. Results indicate that size 3 and size 4 sibships provided large increases in power over size 2 sibships. On average a size 3 (4) sibship is 3 (6 to 7) times as...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alleles
Share to Analysis of Variance
Share to Family Characteristics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Phenotype

Share to Social Environment

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 10547922
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021687817609

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 8 closest

A note on the power provided by sibships of sizes 2, 3, and 4 in genetic covariance modeling of a codominant QTL.PMID 10547922Read ↗

A note on including phenotypic information from monozygotic twins in variance components QTL linkage analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the power of variance component linkage analysis in large pedigrees.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of power to detect a QTL in sib-pair data using multivariate phenotypes, mean phenotypes, and factor scores.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Inference of genetic architecture from chromosome partitioning analyses is sensitive to genome variation, sample size, heritability and effect size distribution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing power of different methods for QTL detection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The power of association studies to detect the contribution of candidate genetic loci to variation in complex traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics of complex traits: prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Statistical methods for genome-wide and sequencing association studies of complex traits in related samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.