Article

Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines

2019-08-30

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> When studying the microbiome using next generation sequencing, DNA extraction method, sequencing procedures and bioinformatic processing are crucial to obtain reliable data. Method choice has been demonstrated to strongly affect the final biological interpretation. We assessed the performance of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelines for bacterial microbiota profiling throu...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: fe15cfcf-3fd6-5391-b2de-d3aca664ea0b
DOI: 10.1101/751123

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of three DNA extraction methods and two bioinformatic pipelinesDOI 10.1101/751123Read

Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic PipelinesSemantic proximity Read

DNA extraction for human microbiome studies: the issue of standardizationSemantic proximity Read

Validation and standardization of DNA extraction and library construction methods for metagenomics-based human fecal microbiome measurementsSemantic proximity Read

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read

A unique and reliable fecal DNA extraction method for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read

Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is MinorSemantic proximity Read

The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community RecoverySemantic proximity Read

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read

A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool SamplesSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differencesSemantic proximity Read