Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analyses

16 Feb 2024

Abstract excerpt

The lack of standardization in the methods of DNA extraction from fecal samples represents the major source of experimental variation in the microbiome research field. In this study, we aimed to compare the metagenomic profiles and microbiome-phenotype associations obtained by applying two commercially available DNA extraction kits: the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (APK) and the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (FSK)....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Gut microbiota and health

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 38366085
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54353-w

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesPMID 38366085Read ↗

Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analysesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platformSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differencesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Optimizing storage, high-molecular weight DNA extraction and genome reconstructions from human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A unique and reliable fecal DNA extraction method for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic PipelinesSemantic proximity Read ↗

DNA extraction for human microbiome studies: the issue of standardizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of Sample Type and DNA Isolation Procedure on Genomic Inference of Microbiome CompositionSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.