Back to search

Article

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

2020-09-14

Abstract excerpt

<p>Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline. <h4>Obje...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
75d0966d-7b6e-5142-b0ca-817b3a75a257
DOI
10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsDOI 10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity
Annotations to Structure a Systematic Review: Methodological Update and Key Principles Using the S0–S3 FlowSemantic proximity
Analysis of Methodological Quality of The Process of Moving From Evidence to Recommendations in Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Between 2010 and 2020: A Cross-Sectional StudySemantic proximity
Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolSemantic proximity
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysisSemantic proximity
PROTOCOL: LLM-Generated CONSORT Report for Increased Reporting: A Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity
Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping ReviewSemantic proximity
Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity
Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocolSemantic proximity
Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in SwedenSemantic proximity
[How can we find, design, evaluate and use clinical practice guidelines?].Semantic proximity
Quantitative bias analysis methods for summary level epidemiologic data in the peer-reviewed literature: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.