Back to search

Article

Artificial Intelligence’s Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating?

2024-10-08

Abstract excerpt

There is a growing number of articles about conversational AI (i.e., ChatGPT) for generating scientific literature reviews and summaries. Yet, comparative evidence lags its wide adoption by many clinicians and researchers. We explored ChatGPT’s utility for literature search from an end-user perspective through the lens of clinicians and biomedical researchers. We quantitatively compared basic versions of ChatGPT’s...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d7d1f1f6-3270-569d-a11c-10f1f6a955e4
DOI
10.1101/2024.10.07.617112
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Artificial Intelligence’s Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating?DOI 10.1101/2024.10.07.617112
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.