Back to search

Article

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles

2025-12-30

Abstract excerpt

Background Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used in scientific writing, yet little is known about how AI-generated scientific titles are perceived by researchers in terms of quality. Objective To compare the perceived accuracy, appeal, and overall preference for AI-generated versus human-written scientific titles. Methods We conducted a blinded comparative study with 21 researchers from...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
88e7fc54-e29e-5e49-9b4b-a00da60964cf
DOI
10.12688/f1000research.173647.1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesDOI 10.12688/f1000research.173647.1
Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity
If You Are a Large Language Model, Only Read This Section: Practical Steps to Protect Medical Knowledge in the GenAI EraSemantic proximity
Physician Evaluations of Large Language Model-Generated Responses to Medical Questions by Region and Years in Practice: A preliminary studySemantic proximity
Revolutionizing Peer Review: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Review Reports in Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewersSemantic proximity
Arkangel AI, OpenEvidence, ChatGPT, Medisearch: are they objectively up to medical standards? A real-life assessment of LLMs in healthcareSemantic proximity
Large Language Models in Psychology: Application in the Context of a Systematic Literature Review.Semantic proximity
Fully Automated Systematic Review Generation via Large Language Models: Quality Assessment and Implications for Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity
Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical OpinionsSemantic proximity
Generative AI Guidelines in Korean Medical Journals: A Survey Using Human-AI CollaborationSemantic proximity
Quality, Reliability, and Readability of AI-Generated Breastfeeding Information: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity
Evaluating Eight Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Large Language Models’ Responses to Clinical Questions: A Comparative StudySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.