Back to search

Article

Evaluating a Large Language Model’s Ability to Answer Clinicians’ Requests for Evidence Summaries

2024-05-03

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective</h4> This study investigated the performance of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) tool using GPT-4 in answering clinical questions in comparison with medical librarians’ gold-standard evidence syntheses. <h4>Methods</h4> Questions were extracted from an in-house database of clinical evidence requests previously answered by medical librarians. Questions with multiple parts were subdivided into...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3859b543-f38b-549e-be1c-bf067ae916de
DOI
10.1101/2024.05.01.24306691
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating a Large Language Model’s Ability to Answer Clinicians’ Requests for Evidence SummariesDOI 10.1101/2024.05.01.24306691
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.