Back to search

Article

Will generative AI help solve systematic literature reviews? Evidence from a 2-year research programme

2026-02-04

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) underpin clinical, regulatory, and policy decision-making but are time- and resource-intensive, particularly during data extraction and synthesis. Advances in large language models (LLMs) have renewed interest in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted SLR workflows, but robust, large-scale evaluations against decision-grade standards remain...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
2355e791-1b35-5396-ac2c-2edbd2071583
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-8729984/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Will generative AI help solve systematic literature reviews? Evidence from a 2-year research programmeDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8729984/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.