Back to search

Article

A Review of a Hybrid Evaluation Framework for Clinical AI: Integrating Interrater Reliability with the "LLM as a Judge" Methodology

2026-06-16

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into clinical workflows is driven by studies claiming performance that rivals or exceeds human experts. However, these claims frequently rely on "Gold Standard" datasets generated by human annotators, assuming these annotations represent an objective truth. This assumption overlooks the inherent variability and noise in h...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a377aef6-5fa8-5416-b3df-e62397917faa
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10047888/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Review of a Hybrid Evaluation Framework for Clinical AI: Integrating Interrater Reliability with the "LLM as a Judge" MethodologyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10047888/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.