Back to search

Article

Evaluating an LLM-Assisted Workflow for Clinical Documentation: <i>A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Time and Quality</i>

2025-10-07

Abstract excerpt

<h4>IMPORTANCE</h4> Large language models (LLMs) have been investigated for clinical documentation, with concerns about hallucinations and factual errors. Clinician review and revision of LLM-generated drafts are therefore considered essential, yet the impact of such workflow on both documentation time and quality remains unknown. <h4>OBJECTIVE</h4> To assess whether physician review and editing of LLM-generated...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d813eeab-079e-529b-b795-7b8ff4650840
DOI
10.1101/2025.10.06.25337211
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating an LLM-Assisted Workflow for Clinical Documentation: <i>A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Time and Quality</i>DOI 10.1101/2025.10.06.25337211
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.