Back to search

Article

A comparison of methods for interpreting random forest models of genetic association in the presence of non-additive interactions.

2021-01-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background:</bold> Non-additive interactions among genes are frequently associated with a number of phenotypes, including known complex diseases such as Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Detecting interactions requires careful selection of analytical methods, and some machine learning algorithms are unable or underpowered to detect or model feature interactions th...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a2b938a7-3538-511a-8bf8-4a6bafd963ae
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-45186/v3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A comparison of methods for interpreting random forest models of genetic association in the presence of non-additive interactions.DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-45186/v3
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.