Back to search

Article

The limits of inductive reasoning for clinical evidence appraisal – a simulation study (Protocol)

2023-08-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Objectives: To establish the possible likelihood of a body of evidence, inductively judged to be of ’low bias risk’/‘high-quality’ according to a limited set of appraisal criteria, of actually being error free. <h4>Methods:</h4> We will generate 45 simulation trials and randomly assign to each 0-5 errors out of a total of 65 error domains. The trials will then be appraised for errors wi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
87f8cb5e-aac9-566d-9b2b-0eff94c02146
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3247631/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The limits of inductive reasoning for clinical evidence appraisal – a simulation study (Protocol)DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3247631/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.