Article

How far can AI help with assessing the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications? Review of concepts, methods, and questions.

2025-04-07

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> There is an increasing number of tools that use AI to carry out assessments of published clinical research. <h4>Objective: </h4> We set out to address the question: “Which AI-enhanced tools have been developed or used to help with evaluation of the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications?” <h4>Methods: </h4> We searched five databases for publications of tools, checklists or methods...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 9dbfc1cb-1567-5e85-bc02-221fb96427ab
DOI: 10.22541/au.174400563.39385458/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How far can AI help with assessing the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications? Review of concepts, methods, and questions.DOI 10.22541/au.174400563.39385458/v1Read

Artificial Intelligence in Systematic Reviews: Overcoming Reproducibility, Bias and Validation ChallengesSemantic proximity Read

Research integrity in randomised clinical trials: an umbrella review.Semantic proximity Read

Stage-wise algorithmic bias, its reporting, and relation to classical systematic review biases in AI-based automated screening in health sciences: A structured literature reviewSemantic proximity Read

Monitoring of Open Science practices: a survey of 10 major medical journalsSemantic proximity Read

When Science Loses Its Immune System: Epistemic Immunodepression in the Age of AISemantic proximity Read

Annotations to Structure a Systematic Review: Methodological Update and Key Principles Using the S0–S3 FlowSemantic proximity Read

Agentic AI for Streamlining Title and Abstract Screening: Addressing Precision and evaluating calibration of AI guardrailsSemantic proximity Read

Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity Read

Evaluating Loon Lens Pro™, an AI-Driven Tool for Full-Text Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Validation StudySemantic proximity Read

A Meta-Research Framework for Transparent, Ethically Accountable Integration of CAMSemantic proximity Read

Invisible Text Injection: The Trojan Horse of AI-Assisted Medical Peer ReviewSemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Systematic Review of Guidelines on Reporting and Interpreting StudiesSemantic proximity Read