Back to search

Article

The limits of inductive reasoning for clinical evidence appraisal – a simulation study (Preprint)

2023-08-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Objectives To establish the possible likelihood of a body of evidence, inductively judged to be of ‘low bias risk’/‘high-quality’ according to a limited set of appraisal criteria, of actually being error-free. Methods A total of 45 simulation trials were generated and randomly assigned to 0–5 errors out of a total of 65 error domains. The trials were then appraised for errors with a s...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
e77d36fd-14fb-52bc-a2de-8e841af65077
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281346/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The limits of inductive reasoning for clinical evidence appraisal – a simulation study (Preprint)DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281346/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.