Back to search

Article

Plasma vs. serum: which is better for proteomic blood biomarker analysis? Evaluation of the novel NULISA platform

2025-11-09

Abstract excerpt

<h4>STRUCTURED ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>INTRODUCTION</h4> The NULISASeq™ CNS Disease Panel has high potential for AD diagnosis, but the comparability of serum vs. plasma remains unclear. <h4>METHODS</h4> We compared its performance on 43 matched serum-plasma pairs from a memory clinic cohort. <h4>RESULTS</h4> The panel reproducibly quantified 124 targets (mean CV=4.9%) with high detectability (mean=95.7%). Serum-plas...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
561e2327-d84e-5aa1-b91c-672964102988
DOI
10.1101/2025.11.08.25339626
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Plasma vs. serum: which is better for proteomic blood biomarker analysis? Evaluation of the novel NULISA platformDOI 10.1101/2025.11.08.25339626
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.