Back to search

Article

Issues with Specification of Margins and Analytic Methods on Potential Bias Towards the Alternative in Randomized Noninferiority Pragmatic Trials: Results of a Literature Survey

2022-08-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background:</bold> Issues with specification of margins and analytic methods can potentially bias results towards the alternative in randomized noninferiority pragmatic trials. To investigate this potential for bias we conducted a targeted search of the medical literature to examine how noninferiority pragmatic trials address these issues. <bold>Methods:</bold> An Ovid MEDLINE dat...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
560ca195-4e9c-572d-bdf7-4f7e90a87ea0
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-1846419/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Issues with Specification of Margins and Analytic Methods on Potential Bias Towards the Alternative in Randomized Noninferiority Pragmatic Trials: Results of a Literature SurveyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1846419/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.