Article

Comparing human and artificial intelligence in writing for health journals: an exploratory study

2023-02-26

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Aim and objectives</h4> The aim was to contribute to the editorial principles on the possible use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)- based tools for scientific writing. The objectives included Enlist the inclusion and exclusion criteria to test ChatGPT use in scientific writing Develop evaluation criteria to assess the quality of articles written by human authors and ChatGPT Compare prospecti...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 3db32168-fd76-501c-8d06-2efde369d957
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.22.23286322

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing human and artificial intelligence in writing for health journals: an exploratory studyDOI 10.1101/2023.02.22.23286322Read

Comparing New Tools of Artificial Intelligence to the Authentic Intelligence of our Global Health StudentsSemantic proximity Read

Unreported use of artificial intelligence in three ABAI publications: A call for more transparencySemantic proximity Read

Development of a Rapid Assessment Method for Responsible Use of Generative AI in Scientific Research: Application to the Ugandan Research ContextSemantic proximity Read

Natural Language Processing and Generative AI in the Automated Scoring and Feedback of Reflective Writing in Medical Education: A Validity and Fairness AnalysisSemantic proximity Read

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity Read

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Systematic Review of Guidelines on Reporting and Interpreting StudiesSemantic proximity Read

Comparing Artificial Intelligence versus Human Screening in Systematic ReviewsSemantic proximity Read

Generative AI Guidelines in Korean Medical Journals: A Survey Using Human-AI CollaborationSemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence in Systematic Reviews: Overcoming Reproducibility, Bias and Validation ChallengesSemantic proximity Read

The Perfect AI Research Assistant: Are ScholarGPT’s References More Reliable than ChatGPT’s?Semantic proximity Read

Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysisSemantic proximity Read