Back to search

Article

The Perfect AI Research Assistant: Are ScholarGPT’s References More Reliable than ChatGPT’s?

2025-03-21

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Introduction: </bold>Artificial Intelligence has made a big impact in surgery, particularly in surgical academia. ChatGPT’s role in research has been widely studied but has received scepticism for generating inaccurate and non-existent references. ScholarGPT has been introduced to address these concerns, but its reliability has yet to be assessed. This study therefore aims to eval...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0a0d2e5f-3e78-5b52-8504-011fd4ceb0c2
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6254598/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The Perfect AI Research Assistant: Are ScholarGPT’s References More Reliable than ChatGPT’s?DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6254598/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.