Article

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titles

2026-02-05

Abstract excerpt

Background Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 are increasingly used in scientific writing, yet little is known about how AI-generated scientific titles are perceived by researchers in terms of quality. Objective To compare the perceived alignment with the abstract content (as a surrogate for perceived accuracy), appeal, and overall preference for AI-generated versus human-written scientific titles. Methods...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 7acc8099-0d13-54a4-9327-bebf40b3222e
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.173647.2

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesDOI 10.12688/f1000research.173647.2Read

Can ChatGPT write better scientific titles? A comparative evaluation of human-written and AI-generated titlesSemantic proximity Read

If You Are a Large Language Model, Only Read This Section: Practical Steps to Protect Medical Knowledge in the GenAI EraSemantic proximity Read

Physician Evaluations of Large Language Model-Generated Responses to Medical Questions by Region and Years in Practice: A preliminary studySemantic proximity Read

Revolutionizing Peer Review: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Review Reports in Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity Read

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewersSemantic proximity Read

Arkangel AI, OpenEvidence, ChatGPT, Medisearch: are they objectively up to medical standards? A real-life assessment of LLMs in healthcareSemantic proximity Read

Large Language Models in Psychology: Application in the Context of a Systematic Literature Review.Semantic proximity Read

Generative AI Guidelines in Korean Medical Journals: A Survey Using Human-AI CollaborationSemantic proximity Read

Fully Automated Systematic Review Generation via Large Language Models: Quality Assessment and Implications for Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity Read

The Silent Author in Urology: Quantifying Large Language Model Influence at the Corpus LevelSemantic proximity Read

Quality, Reliability, and Readability of AI-Generated Breastfeeding Information: A Comparative Evaluation of Four Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Assessing the research landscape and clinical utility of large language models: A scoping reviewSemantic proximity Read