Back to search

Article

Variations in Gut Microbiome Profiles Based on Different DNA Extraction Methods: A Comparative Study

2024-03-08

Abstract excerpt

Objectives. To compare four DNA extraction methods for recovering bacterial DNA from mammalian faecal samples. Methods and Results. Three commercial kits from QIAamp, TIANamp, and MAGEN, together with the classic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, were evaluated for their performance in extracting bacterial DNA from the gut microbiota of five mammals, including humans (Homo sapiens), macaques (Macaca mu...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3833d5bd-8224-5cdb-9961-90d2f218ab7a
DOI
10.1155/2024/6653560
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Variations in Gut Microbiome Profiles Based on Different DNA Extraction Methods: A Comparative StudyDOI 10.1155/2024/6653560
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity
The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community RecoverySemantic proximity
Fecal Microbiota Analysis: An Overview of Sample Collection Methods and Sequencing StrategiesSemantic proximity
Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studiesSemantic proximity
Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differencesSemantic proximity
High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studiesSemantic proximity
The Impact of Different DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories upon the Assessment of Human Gut Microbiota Composition by 16S rRNA Gene SequencingSemantic proximity
Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is MinorSemantic proximity
Assessment of DNA extraction methods for human gut mycobiome analysisSemantic proximity
Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic PipelinesSemantic proximity
A unique and reliable fecal DNA extraction method for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity
The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applicationsSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.