Back to search

Article

A Comparison of Quality and Readability of ChatGPT-4 generated and Human-generated Patient Education Materials for Total Knee Arthroplasty 

2024-11-14

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential role of artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT-4, in generating patient education materials (PEMs) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of our study was to compare the quality and readability of PEMs for TKA generated by ChatGPT-4 with those created by human experts, to assess the potential for the use of AI i...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
21699b58-74a6-5075-8046-cc66e0306f0b
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-5366386/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparison of Quality and Readability of ChatGPT-4 generated and Human-generated Patient Education Materials for Total Knee ArthroplastyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5366386/v1
Readability, Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of ChatGPT Generated GI Patient Education vs AGA Patient CenterSemantic proximity
Enhancing Patient Education With AI:A Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Versus American Academy of Ophthalmology Online Patient Education MaterialsSemantic proximity
ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0: A Head to Head Comparison in Generating Pharyngitis Patient GuidesSemantic proximity
Evaluation of the Quality of ChatGPT’s Responses to Top 20 Questions about Robotic Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Findings, Perspectives and Critical Remark on Healthcare EducationSemantic proximity
Evaluating ChatGPT-4o’s Web-Enhanced Responses in Patient Education: Ankle Stabilization Surgery as a Case StudySemantic proximity
Assessing the Quality of AI-Generated Health Information: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Patient Education on Dental VeneersSemantic proximity
Comparative efficacy of ChatGPT-5.1 Auto and DeepSeek-V3.1 Thinking in answering patients’ questions on cervical spine surgerySemantic proximity
Assessment of ChatGPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions in Oral Surgery: A Study on Validity, Readability, and Temporal ConsistencySemantic proximity
Responses of AI Chatbots to Testosterone Replacement Therapy: Patient's Beware!Semantic proximity
User evaluations of AI- and human-generated responses in digital health communication: A paired survey studySemantic proximity
Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice QuestionsSemantic proximity
Quality and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Comparative StudySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.