Back to search

Article

Assessing the Quality of AI-Generated Health Information: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Patient Education on Dental Veneers

2026-08-05

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> Background This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the accuracy, reliability, quality, and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT-5.3 mini, Gemini-3.5 Flash, DeepSeek-V4, and Microsoft Copilot to frequently asked questions concerning laminate veneers. Methods A Google search identified 266 laminate veneer FAQs from the first 30 websites; after exclusions, the 20 most frequ...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f9610fd6-fce0-5028-b00c-584bd589db4d
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10533070/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Assessing the Quality of AI-Generated Health Information: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Patient Education on Dental VeneersDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10533070/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.