Back to search

Article

Comparative efficacy of ChatGPT-5.1 Auto and DeepSeek-V3.1 Thinking in answering patients’ questions on cervical spine surgery        

2026-01-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold>Background</bold> This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of two artificial intelligence (AI) large language models, ChatGPT-5.1 Auto and DeepSeek-V3.1 Thinking, in generating responses to common patient questions regarding cervical spine surgery. The assessment focused on the quality of the generated content for pre-operative education across five key dimensio...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
28d1a2a0-cea6-51fe-86f9-25a730896e96
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-8551438/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparative efficacy of ChatGPT-5.1 Auto and DeepSeek-V3.1 Thinking in answering patients’ questions on cervical spine surgeryDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8551438/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.