Back to search

Article

Quality and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Comparative Study

2026-08-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Objective To compare the information quality, source transparency, educational value, and readability of responses generated by four widely used artificial intelligence chatbots to patient questions about EPI and determine whether the content met the sixth-grade reading level recommended for patient education materials. Methods A web-based cross-sectional comparative design was used....

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8207f137-2103-594c-a409-c85c3e542369
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10521656/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Quality and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Comparative StudyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10521656/v1
Readability, Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of ChatGPT Generated GI Patient Education vs AGA Patient CenterSemantic proximity
ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0: A Head to Head Comparison in Generating Pharyngitis Patient GuidesSemantic proximity
Assessing the Quality of AI-Generated Health Information: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models in Patient Education on Dental VeneersSemantic proximity
Assessment of ChatGPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions in Oral Surgery: A Study on Validity, Readability, and Temporal ConsistencySemantic proximity
Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice QuestionsSemantic proximity
Comparison of DeepSeek, ChatGPT-4, and Online Medical Platforms in Addressing Chronic Pancreatitis Related QuestionsSemantic proximity
Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice QuestionsSemantic proximity
Can AI answer my questions? Using Artificial Intelligence to help provide information for patients with a stomaSemantic proximity
Artificial Intelligence in Obstetrics: Evaluating ChatGPT and Google Gemini in Answering Patient QuestionsSemantic proximity
Close, But no Cigar: Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT-4o and OpenAI o1-preview in Answering Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-Related QuestionsSemantic proximity
Performance of ChatGPT-4 and Bard Chatbots in Responding to Common Patient Questions on Prostate Cancer 177Lu-PSMA-617 TherapySemantic proximity
Large Language Models as Ophthalmic Patient Educators: A Comparative Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and ActionabilitySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.