Article

Data extraction error in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions for evidence synthesis: Study protocol for a crossover trial

2022-08-30

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Data extraction is the foundation for research synthesis evidence, and it is often time- and labor-consuming, and prone to errors. Whilst data extraction errors frequently occur in the literature, an interesting phenomenon was observed that data extraction error tend to be more common in trials of pharmaceutical interventions compared to non-pharmaceutical ones. This phenomenon has not been ver...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: bc8b1f85-cc34-52eb-b5e6-ef656ce3272e
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.27.22279301

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Data extraction error in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions for evidence synthesis: Study protocol for a crossover trialDOI 10.1101/2022.08.27.22279301Read

Randomized clinical trial quality has improved over time but is still not good enough: an analysis of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018Semantic proximity Read

Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolSemantic proximity Read

Error Rates of Data Processing Methods in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Manuscripts Identified Through PubMedSemantic proximity Read

Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity Read

PROTOCOL: LLM-Generated CONSORT Report for Increased Reporting: A Parallel-Arm Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read

How good are large language models for automated data extraction from randomized trials?Semantic proximity Read

Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.Semantic proximity Read

Disagreement as a signal: an auditable dual-LLM and human-arbitrated workflow for methodological quality assessment in preclinical complex-intervention evidenceSemantic proximity Read

Systematic Pyramid Reviews – A new method of evidence synthesis from different research approaches for routine health care decision making and practiceSemantic proximity Read

The Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Cochrane ReviewsSemantic proximity Read

Zombie trials are often monocentric and cluster within fabricated evidence “factories”: a cohort study of 236 retracted randomized controlled trials with confirmed data fabricationSemantic proximity Read

The Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Cochrane ReviewsSemantic proximity Read