Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Monoclonal anti-D specificity and Rh D structure: criteria for selection of monoclonal anti-D reagents for routine typing of patients and donors.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) - 1 Sept 1995

Jones J, Scott M L, Voak D

Abstract excerpt

The Rh blood group system is the next most important to the ABO system in terms of its clinical significance in blood transfusion. It is vital to the safe, efficient practice of transfusion medicine that Rh D phenotyping tests are selected, executed and interpreted correctly. However, the Rh D blood group antigen has been shown to be subject to many phenotypic variations, and different reagents and typing...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antibodies, Monoclonal
Share to Antibody Specificity

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Blood Donors

Share to Epitopes

Share to ABO gene

Share to Phenotype

Share to Pregnancy

Share to Rh-Hr Blood-Group System

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 8593521
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.1995.tb00225.x

Genes

ABO

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Monoclonal anti-D specificity and Rh D structure: criteria for selection of monoclonal anti-D reagents for routine typing of patients and donors.PMID 8593521Read ↗

Results of the DGTI workshop on the evaluation of the reactivity of monoclonal anti-D.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Results of the DGTI workshop on the evaluation of the reactivity of monoclonal anti-D.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variants of RhD--current testing and clinical consequences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Monoclonal antibodies in blood group serology. Part 2: MNS, Rh and other blood group systems].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anti-D reagents should be chosen accordingly to the prevalence of D variants in the obstetric population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Partial D, weak D types, and novel RHD alleles among 33,864 multiethnic patients: implications for anti-D alloimmunization and prevention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serologic and molecular characterization of D variants in Brazilians: impact for typing and transfusion strategy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak D types with different serologic techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serological and molecular characterisation of the most prevalent weak D variants in Croatian population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.