Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.

Immunohematology - 1 Dec 2024

Theiler Crystal, Lomas-Francis Christine, Vege Sunitha, Chevrier Marie-Claire, Leiva-Torres Gabriel André, Keller Margaret A, Kaherl Katherine, Coppolino Trina, Johnson Susan T

Abstract excerpt

Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by RHD genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Agglutination Tests
Share to Alleles

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Blood Grouping and Crossmatching

Share to Genotype

Share to Isoantibodies

Share to Rh-Hr Blood-Group System

Share to Rho(D) Immune Globulin

Share to Serologic Tests

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 39740012
DOI: 10.2478/immunohematology-2024-022

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 23 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.PMID 39740012Read ↗

Rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak D types with different serologic techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Partial D, weak D types, and novel RHD alleles among 33,864 multiethnic patients: implications for anti-D alloimmunization and prevention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular analysis of patients with weak D and serologic analysis of those with anti-D (excluding type 1 and type 2).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serologic and molecular characterization of D variants in Brazilians: impact for typing and transfusion strategy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak D phenotypes and transfusion safety: where do we stand in daily practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of RHD allelic variants discovered by atypical typing results on the NEO/Echo platforms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the serological underrecognition of patients with weak or partial RHD variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Case of Weak D Serologic Phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.