Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen.

Transfusion - 1 Feb 2024

Juhl David, Luckner Kathrin, Brockmann Christian, Musiolik Ingrid, Bunge-Philipowski Tina, Görg Siegfried, Ziemann Malte

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Serologic typing with monoclonal anti-D is mandatory for RHD antigen determination before transfusion, but due to aberrant (weak or partial) variants of RHD, results may be ambiguous and molecular RHD-typing is required. Before that, RHD-negative (RHD -) red blood cells concentrates (RBCs) shall be transfused to avoid anti-D formation, which probably leads to wastage of RHD - RBCs....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alleles
Share to Blood Group Antigens

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Blood Transfusion

Share to Erythrocytes

Share to Genotype

Share to Phenotype

Share to Rh-Hr Blood-Group System

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 38142051
DOI: 10.1111/trf.17691

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen.PMID 38142051Read ↗

Is current serologic RhD typing of blood donors sufficient for avoiding immunization of recipients?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular analysis of patients with weak D and serologic analysis of those with anti-D (excluding type 1 and type 2).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak D phenotypes and transfusion safety: where do we stand in daily practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Primary anti‐D immunization by weak D type 2 RBCsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak D types with different serologic techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of RHD alleles with the potential of anti-D immunization among seemingly D- blood donors in Upper Austria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity of the RHD gene in blood donors from the Brazilian Central-WestSemantic proximity Read ↗

RHD and RHCE molecular analysis in weak D blood donors and in patients with Rh antibodies against their own corresponding Rh antigen.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rh Immune Globulin After the Transfusion of RhD-Positive Blood in a Patient with a Partial D Antigen.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.