Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.

Journal of animal science - 1 Jun 2017

Lucherk L W, O'Quinn T G, Legako J F, Rathmann R J, Brooks J C, Miller M F

Abstract excerpt

The objective of this study was to evaluate multiple instrumental measures of beef juiciness and determine their relationships with sensory panel juiciness ratings. Treatments were selected to maximize variation in juiciness and included 5 USDA quality grades (Prime, upper two-thirds Choice, lower one-third Choice, Select, and Standard) as well as 2 enhanced Select treatments (112 and 107% of the initial raw...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Body Weight
Share to Cattle
Share to Color

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cooking

Share to Hydrogen-Ion Concentration

Share to Red Meat

Share to Regression Analysis

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28727037
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016.0930

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings.PMID 28727037Read ↗

Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Biochemical measurements of beef are a good predictor of untrained consumer sensory scores across muscles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Review: Improving the nutritional, sensory and market value of meat products from sheep and cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The relevance of different near infrared technologies and sample treatments for predicting meat quality traits in commercial beef cuts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effects of ultimate pH and color on sensory traits of pork loin chops cooked to a medium-rare degree of doneness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting pork quality using Vis/NIR spectroscopy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Measuring the Material Properties Related to Human Perceptions  Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chemical instrumental analysis versus human evaluation to measure sensory properties of dairy products: What is fit for purpose?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Utilization of beef from different cattle phenotypes to produce a guaranteed tender beef product.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.