Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Topics Community

Article

The impact of self-report inaccuracy in the UK Biobank and its interplay with selective participation.

Nature human behaviour - 1 Mar 2025

Schoeler Tabea, Pingault Jean-Baptiste, Kutalik Zoltán

Abstract excerpt

Although the use of short self-report measures is common practice in biobank initiatives, such a phenotyping strategy is inherently prone to reporting errors. To explore challenges related to self-report errors, we first derived a reporting error score in the UK Biobank (UKBB; n = 73,127), capturing inconsistent self-reporting in time-invariant phenotypes across multiple measurement occasions. We then performed...

Topics

Humans
United Kingdom
Self Report
Biological Specimen Banks
Genome-Wide Association Study
Reproducibility of Results
Male
Female
Phenotype
Adult
Middle Aged

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Mendelian Randomization Analysis

UK Biobank

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 39695248
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02061-w
PMCID: PMC11936832

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 31 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The impact of self-report inaccuracy in the UK Biobank and its interplay with selective participation.PMID 39695248Read ↗

Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Re-evaluating the robustness of Mendelian randomisation to measurement errorSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide analyses of behavioural traits are subject to bias by misreports and longitudinal changesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide analyses of behavioural traits biased by misreports and longitudinal changesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic influence on within-person longitudinal change in anthropometric traits in the UK Biobank.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification and analysis of individuals who deviate from their genetically-predicted phenotypeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK BiobankSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting and Adjusting for Hidden Biases due to Phenotype Misclassification in Genome-Wide Association StudiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Correcting for volunteer bias in GWAS increases SNP effect sizes and heritability estimates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.