Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Performance of 16S rRNA Gene Next-Generation Sequencing and the Culture Method in the Detection of Bacteria in Clinical Specimens

21 Jun 2024

Abstract excerpt

Effective treatment of infectious diseases requires prompt and accurate bacterial identification and tailored antimicrobial treatments. Traditional culture methods are considered the gold standard, but their effectiveness diminishes for fastidious and hard-to-grow microorganisms. In recent years, molecular diagnostic tools such as 16S rRNA gene next-generation sequencing (16S NGS) have gained popularity in the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Share to Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Share to Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 39001210
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131318

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Performance of 16S rRNA Gene Next-Generation Sequencing and the Culture Method in the Detection of Bacteria in Clinical SpecimensPMID 39001210Read ↗

Traditional Cultures versus Next Generation Sequencing for Suspected Orthopedic Infection: Experience Gained from a Reference CentreSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of 16S-Based Metagenomic NGS as Diagnostic Tool in Different Types of Culture-Negative InfectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Targeted Metagenomic Sequencing-based Approach Applied to 2146 Tissue and Body Fluid Samples in Routine Clinical PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Next Generation Sequencing Outperforms Standard Microbiological Culture for Characterizing Polymicrobial SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Advantages and Limitations of 16S rRNA Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory: Perspectives from a Middle-Income CountrySemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of 16S and 18S rRNA gene targeted next-generation sequencing based on five years of clinical experienceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Improves Pathogen Detection and Rational Use in Patients with Infectious Fever: A Retrospective StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Pathogen Culture and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Implications for Empirical Antibiotic Selection: An 9-Year Retrospective StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Advancing Clinical Microbiology: Applications and Future of Next-Generation SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of bacterial pathogens from clinical specimens using conventional microbial culture and 16S metagenomics: a comparative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Pathogenic Detection by Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in Skin and Soft Tissue InfectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative of clinical performance between next-generation sequencing and standard blood culture diagnostic method in patients suffering from sepsisSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.