Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples

1 Jul 2002

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
Share to Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Share to Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 11997164
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00018-0

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samplesPMID 11997164Read ↗

Comparison of seven methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal and cecal samples of miceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of five commercial methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from human faecal samples for downstream molecular detection of the enteric protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba sppSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of two approaches to extracting Cryptosporidium DNA from human stools as measured by a real-time PCR assaySemantic proximity Read ↗

New methods for selective isolation of bacterial DNA from human clinical specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Selective isolation of bacterial DNA from human clinical specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Effects from DNA Extraction Methods on the Evaluation of Microbial Diversity Associated with Human Colonic TissueSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative evaluation of in-house manual, and commercial semi-automated and automated DNA extraction platforms in the sample preparation of human stool specimens for a Salmonella enterica 5'-nuclease assaySemantic proximity Read ↗

A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiomeSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.