Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment

25 May 2018

Abstract excerpt

This study enumerated patients' preference-based personal utility and willingness-to-pay for massively parallel sequencing (MPS) genetic testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Our setting was the New Exome Technology in (NEXT) Medicine Study, a randomized control trial of usual care genetic testing vs. exome sequencing. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we elicited patient preferences for information on...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29802320
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0161-z

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 23 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experimentPMID 29802320Read ↗

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Next-Generation Sequencing Panels for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis Syndromes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative effectiveness of next generation genomic sequencing for disease diagnosis: design of a randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal cancer/polyposis syndromes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Risk-Informed Chronic Disease Screening and Early Detection: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of Patient Preferences on the Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Lynch SyndromeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public preferences for the value and implementation of genomic newborn screening: Insights from two discrete choice experiments in AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Real-world cost-effectiveness of panel-based genomic testing to inform therapeutic decisions for metastatic colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences for learning different types of genome sequencing results among young breast cancer patients: Role of psychological and clinical factors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Summaries for patients. Comparing the benefits and costs of testing for genetic causes of colon cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.